Are Global Trends Affecting
University Degree Values?
“It is risky to invest in a
U.S. Degree
as its value could diminish even further...”
Is it
possible that the real value of a university degree, even the one you are contemplating, is being adversely
affected by global geo-political trends? Is it as simple as you have been told? That is, regardless of little
trends, your degree will put you at the top of the lifetime earnings chart compared to those that choose not to
get theirs?
It may indeed be time to take a fresh look. What if the
fundamentals behind the value of your chosen degree have been quietly eroded for the last decade? According to
Leap/E2020, a prestige European think tank, the long range view or forecast clearly indicates that, and they
don't mince words when they say, “risky to invest” in any degree from a university in the United States. They go
on to state, “if you like the sub prime debacle, you will love the coming degree crisis...” (1)
This makes some sense. University degree values follow
trends. Put simply, a Masters degree from Boise State U. is not even on the same planet as one from Harvard or
Yale, and the same goes for a graduate degree from a university in some poverty stricken undeveloped country.
They just don't compare. A degree granted by a university where wealth and prestige are focused will enjoy a
similar prestige. Degree values follow trends.
What are the trends? After 1945 a new world order emerged
that was dominated by the two super powers, United States and USSR. Likewise, two academic super powers reigned
over the rest of academia with U.S. Universities dominant in the west and Soviet universities dominant in the
Soviet bloc countries. By the end of the 80's decade, significant change began to assert itself in the European
Community which ultimately began to put an end to the unrivaled dominance of the two super powers and the
parallel bifurcated academic hegemony.
Two unrelated events ushered in this change. They were the
almost unnoticed Erasmus Inter-academic Programme and the fall of the Berlin Wall. The international value of
college degrees from the disintegrating Soviet geo-political region became worth almost nothing.
According to an Erasmus analysis, in the decade from the mid
80's to the mid 90's, the number of European students studying abroad, that went to the U.S., dropped from 90%
to barely 10%. (2) Meanwhile, the post Berlin Wall U.S. seemed headed for single hyper-mega power status, giving
the U.S. academic community a short virtual monopoly on wealth flowing in from students originating from Latin
American, Asian, Russian, and Arabic countries.
U.S. universities quickly became complacent with de
facto educational quality being largely abdicated to power hungry U.S. recognized accrediting agencies
and tenured professors who all too gladly do their bidding. These agencies became bigger than life in their
influence over academic institutions with devastating consequences, as noted by a host of prominent educational
critics, one of whom characterizes U.S. universities as vast centers of waste, ruled by an oligarchic iron hand
... arrogant .... with overpaid and under worked professors, and referring to a U.S. university education (the
product of intense hyper-governing Accreditation Agencies), as an out and out scam against taxpayers and
students alike. (3)
By 2006 however, global foreign student dynamics had changed
dramatically. European countries , members of the EU, hosted more than twice as many foreign students as the
United States (1.2 million versus 560,000) (4) with Europe's growth paralleling U.S. Losses. (5) According to
UNESCO statistics for 2006, Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, and UK represented half of the world's top student
destinations. (6) Between 1999 and 2005, Japan's foreign student contingent increased 108% and China's increased
213% versus 17% in the U.S. (7) But perhaps the most telling indicator of the educational and cultural
bankruptcy in the U.S. is the fascinating trend of human mobility from Latin America to the U.S. with the worker
element continuing its pattern of going to the United States, while students going to the U.S. is in serious
decline. (8) And on the flip side of the coin, U.S. students are on the move away from U.S. Institutions, with
more obtaining their MBA degree abroad than ever before. (9)
Falling demand yields falling university degree values, and
loss of wealth and prestige also yields falling values. Degree values increase where real wealth and attendant
prestige go, and real wealth has been leaving the citadel of prestige and wealth in the west, the U.S. Prestige
and real wealth, in recent years, has been transferring internationally to such top sophisticated global
financial centers as Panama, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Dubai at an unimaginable rate.(10) The devaluation of
national currency ultimately drives capital wealth out of a region. The U.S. Dollar has lost 95% of its value,
or purchasing power, since 1913 when the current central banking system was imposed on the dollar.
The incalculable cultural, moral, financial, and political
consequences of the globally unpopular U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the repressive legal restrictions and
psychological objections against accessing the United States due to its so-called 'war on terror', and the
catastrophic long term financial difficulties unfolding in the U.S. continue to erode the underlying value of
university degrees from the U.S.
Or, to put it in the words of a prominent European think tank
publication, relied on by millions of readers every month in six languages and 130 countries, “the ongoing
changes entail a complete dislocation of hierarchies established fifty years ago.....the collapse of the world
order created after 1945 affects first and foremost the establishments and values related to the U.S., currently
dissolving under our eyes.”(11)
With these mega changes
as a backdrop and the emergence of the internet as an institution, Marco Polo International University's
multi-national/cultural faculty, student body, administration, classic Oxbridge tutorial and Socratic
learning methodologies, international language capability, global network connections beginning to be
established (so valuable to alumni), low student resource requirements, and student-friendly support position
MPIU as potentially one of the leading universities of the future.
________
NOTES:
1.) Excerpt, GAEB No. 18, October, 2007
2.) Erasmus student mobility study '87/'88 to '04/'05 3.) ProfScam: Professors and the Demise of Higher
Education 4.) Institute of International Education, Atlas of
Student Mobility 5.) MSNBC, August,
2006 6.) UNESCO on global mobility 7.) American Council on Education, outlook for foreign students in the
U.S. 8.) Excerpt, GAEB No. 18, October, 2007 9.) Source: USA Today, 06, June, 2007 10.) Stories From the Desk of a Bullion
Banker, author, Philip Judge 11.) Excerpt, GAEB No. 18, October, 2007
|